Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Food Scientist Brian Wansink Is Getting Yet Another Paper Retracted, This Time For “Unreliable Data”

Brian Wansink of Cornell University is retracting his fifth paper in less than a year.

Last updated on January 3, 2018, at 3:39 p.m. ET

Posted on January 3, 2018, at 3:23 p.m. ET

Gallo Images / Getty Images

Cornell University food behavior scientist Brian Wansink is retracting yet another study, his fifth over the past year, due partly to “unreliable data,” a journal editor told BuzzFeed News.

The paper, which was about factors that motivate people to eat soy, appeared in the journal Appetite in 2003, when Wansink was a professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

The retraction notice — which has not yet been published but was shared with BuzzFeed News by Appetite’s editor — says that the journal is withdrawing the article because of “unreliable data” in a table, which showed results from a survey of soy consumers. The notice also says that the paper’s results and discussion sections contain duplicated text from a 2002 Wansink study that was also about soy consumption.

The retraction was first reported last week by Retraction Watch. Back in March, independent graduate student Nick Brown, one of Wansink’s most vocal critics, blogged about the paper’s statistical inconsistencies and duplicated text.

The journal editor, Suzanne Higgs, also told BuzzFeed News that another Wansink paper is also under investigation. That 2006 study reported receiving 770 survey responses, the same number reported to have come from a handful of other, apparently different surveys in Wansink’s studies.

Brown and other critics have raised red flags about at least 50 studies by Wansink, who studies the psychology of eating. The new retraction is his fifth over the last year — including one that was retracted twice — on top of at least eight published or forthcoming corrections. Cornell is investigating Wansink’s work.

Wansink, Cornell University, and the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign did not immediately respond to requests for comment.



A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.