Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

There's A New Leak Of Classified Information About The Drone Program

The new documents provided to The Intercept add more detail to previous reports on the lack of clarity over just who the U.S. is killing.

Last updated on October 15, 2015, at 1:22 p.m. ET

Posted on October 15, 2015, at 12:44 p.m. ET

Handout / Reuters

A new whistleblower has turned over a trove of documents related to the targeted killing program, providing new details into the way the drones that the United States flies operate.

The documents handed over by the source, who remains unnamed, to The Intercept include slides from targeted operations in Afghanistan, a previously unpublished report from the Pentagon on the problems with the drone program, and condensed packets of information about targets known colloquially as "baseball cards."

Much of the information presented in the trove was known in broad strokes — the U.S. has little idea of the identity of the people killed in drone strikes; those it is uncertain of are after the strikes often labeled as "enemies" despite having no verification of just who they were; armed drone strikes rely on intelligence that can easily be faulty. What the documents do is provide details into the process of just how the program operates, sometimes at a granular level.

U.S. officials, on the other hand, are dismissive of the importance of the documents. "It's clear that these materials are dated (May 2013 appears to be the most recent), and offer only a very narrow snapshot of these operations," one U.S. official told BuzzFeed News in an email.

The information provided in the leak dovetails with previous revelations about the way the U.S. military uses so-called "metadata" from cell phones to help track its targets. But, as The Intercept's source noted, the selectors — phone numbers and e-mail addresses being followed — can easily be wrong.

“It’s stunning the number of instances when selectors are misattributed to certain people," the source said. "And it isn’t until several months or years later that you all of a sudden realize that the entire time you thought you were going after this really hot target, you wind up realizing it was his mother’s phone the whole time.”

In one instance, according to documents from a mission in Afghanistan codenamed "Operation: Haymaker," the U.S. during one period launched 27 strikes against suspected militants. As a result, nineteen targets were killed, according to the slide below, with another 155 unnamed "enemies" killed in action.

The Intercept

When asked about the new leak, a senior administration official pointed to President Barack Obama's 2013 speech on counterterrorism operations, during which he said the U.S. would end the controversial practice of "signature strikes" — bombings based not on clearly identifying the subject, but patterns of behavior.

During that speech, the president "explained why the use of such strikes is just, legal, and necessary to protect the American people from the threat posed by terrorism, emphasizing that by narrowly targeting our action against those who want to kill us and not the people they hide among, we are choosing the course of action least likely to result in the loss of innocent life," the official said.

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.