Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Court Backs Pennsylvania Governor's Suspension Of Death Penalty

Pennsylvania prosecutors challenged the governor's ability to suspend executions. But the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Monday that the reprieve power is "broad" and "constitutionally sound."

Posted on December 21, 2015, at 4:38 p.m. ET

Marc Levy / AP

Gov. Tom Wolf

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court sided with Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf on Monday, ruling that he has the power to suspend executions in the state.

Shortly after assuming office in 2015, Wolf issued a reprieve for an upcoming execution, saying "the capital punishment system has significant and widely recognized defects." The governor implied he would grant a reprieve in any future executions, at least until a task force on the death penalty reported back. he also referred to it as the first step in placing a moratorium on the death penalty in the state.

Some Pennsylvania prosecutors disagreed with Wolf's move, arguing it was a power that the governor did not have. But in a unanimous opinion, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court disagreed.

"We find no limitation on the executive reprieve power relating to the duration of the reprieve, so long as it is temporary in nature and operates only for an interval of time," the court wrote, referring to the reprieve power as "broad."

In a short statement, Wolf said he was "pleased" by the ruling.

Philadelphia District Attorney Seth Williams, who challenged Wolf's reprieves, said he was disappointed in the ruling, but respects it.

"And, as always, we extend our condolences to the victims of these horrendous crimes, who will not soon see the justice that was imposed by the jury and upheld by the courts," a spokesperson for Williams said.

The case focused on Wolf's first reprieve, which was issued to Terrance Williams. Williams was previously scheduled to be executed in March 2014. He is convicted of robbing and beating a man to death with a tire iron in 1984.

The court said the ruling was not an endorsement of Wolf's decision, however.

"Finally, we emphasize that it is not our task to address the wisdom of Governor Wolf’s issuance of Williams’ reprieve, but only its constitutional validity," the court wrote. "Future challenges to reprieves granted by Governor Wolf will have to await independent examination based upon our holdings herein."

Pennsylvania Attorney General Kathleen Kane has also challenged Wolf's reprieve in a separate case. The state has not carried out an execution since 1999.

Read the full ruling:

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.