Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

States And Dem Lawmakers Blocked From Defending Consumer Bureau In Court

An attempt by liberals fails to push back preemptively against expected Trump administration changes.

Posted on February 2, 2017, at 4:06 p.m. ET

Yuri Gripas / Reuters

Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Director Richard Cordray

WASHINGTON — State attorneys general, Democratic lawmakers, and advocacy groups cannot join an ongoing lawsuit in their attempt to defend the independence of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau — an agency that they fear could be gutted under President Trump.

A federal appeals court denied the three requests to intervene in the pending lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of the bureau in a brief order on Thursday. If the current ruling in the case stands, Trump would have an easier time removing the head of the bureau.

The would-be intervenors asked to join the case amid concerns that the Trump administration would drop the government's defense of the agency in court. Under President Obama, the US Department of Justice and the agency fought against challengers who argued — successfully so far — that the CFPB's single-director structure was unconstitutional.

In a one-paragraph order on Thursday, a three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit denied intervention requests filed by a group of state attorneys general, Sen. Sherrod Brown and Rep. Maxine Waters, and a coalition of civil rights and consumer protection groups. The judges did not give a reason for their decision.

The same panel in October found that the bureau's structure was unconstitutional because the president had limited authority to remove the sole director. If that decision stands, it would be easier for Trump to remove Richard Cordray, Obama's CFPB head, if he wants to do so. Republicans have opposed the bureau since it was created as part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform package in 2010.

The bureau's lawyers asked a full sitting of the DC Circuit in November to reconsider the panel's decision, a move that the Justice Department under Obama supported. It's not clear yet whether the Trump administration will take steps to drop that challenge.

In the week after Trump's inauguration, Democratic state attorneys general and other groups went to court to attempt to intervene in several cases where they feared the new administration would change course. Intervention requests are pending in cases that deal with the environment, sex discrimination, and the regulation of for-profit colleges.

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.