A Republican candidate for governor in Michigan responded Wednesday to revelations that he used anti-Muslim unfounded conspiracy theories against a Muslim American Democratic rival with more unfounded conspiracy theories.
BuzzFeed News on Tuesday reported that Patrick Colbeck, who is currently a state senator of Michigan’s 7th District, suggested during an April 2018 presentation that Dr. Abdul El-Sayed is part of an unfounded Muslim plot to engage in “civilization jihad” that is subversively attempting to take over the country.
Colbeck on Wednesday then went as far as to question El-Sayed’s loyalty to the US.
In the April presentation at an event held by the United West, Colbeck said, “We also have somebody that I will likely be running against in the general election, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, whose parents apparently have ties to Muslim Brotherhood back in Egypt. This is scary stuff.”
“They’re already advertising him as the first Muslim governor. So this is a big deal,” Colbeck said in the presentation. The group for which he spoke, the United West, has been classified as an “active anti-Muslim group” by the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks the activity of hate organizations.
On Wednesday, Colbeck responded to BuzzFeed News’ questions. When asked if he believes El-Sayed is engaging in “civilization jihad,” Colbeck referenced a document uncovered during the 2007 trial of the Holy Land Foundation.
“Dr. El-Sayed is running for a high profile political position in our state government,” Colbeck wrote, before quoting from the document in question: “The Ikhwan (Muslim Brotherhood) must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilzation [sic] from within and ‘sabatoging’ [sic] its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”
“It [the memorandum] was uncovered during the 2007 trial of the Holy Land Foundation, an American pro-Palestine group convicted of financing terrorism. The 'Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America,' as it is officially titled, was written in 1991 by a man named Mohamed Akram, who presented it to the Muslim Brotherhood council. It is, in essence, an aspirational document, in which Akram beseeches the Brotherhood to consider what he called his ‘hopes, ambitions and challenges.’
There is no evidence that the Brotherhood paid attention to Akram’s entreaties. In other words, the fact that a functionary in a sprawling organization envisioned an elaborate plan 25 years ago does not mean that the plan has been put into place, much less successfully. And yet, for the anti-Islam lobby, these 15 pages are a smoking gun, cited constantly as proof that America is falling victim to a meticulously orchestrated plot.”
“Politicians look at this [document] like it’s a smoking gun. There's nothing smoking about it,” said Nathan Lean, author of The Islamophobia Industry, and a former research director at Georgetown University’s Bridge Initiative, a program dedicated to studying Islamophobia.
“It was one document written in 1991,” Lean said. “We're talking about something that is nearly three decades old, which is one red flag. When you look at who wrote it, and you look at the kind of language used in it, and you look at the degree to which it did or did not gain traction within the community, you will know it’s a whimsical, fantastical, wishful document, that essentially says, ‘Wouldn't it be great if we could accomplish these things.'”
Lean was part of a team at Georgetown that wrote, “Civilization Jihad:” Debunking the Conspiracy Theory,” in 2016, after then-presidential candidate Ben Carson mentioned the same conspiracy theory in a speech.
“We decided to take a look at the document for ourselves as it was bouncing around in the mainstream, not just being said by a gubernatorial candidate in Michigan,” Lean said, who added that not many people read the document and that the team at Georgetown had gone through it in its proper Arabic translation to reveal the aspirational tone of the memo.
The continued promulgation of the 1991 memo continues to be pushed by well-financed anti-Muslim groups like Brigitte Gabriel’s ACT for America and ex-Pentagon official Frank Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy, which has received over $7 million in funding since 2001. Both groups have furthered conspiracy theories that have long contended that the Muslim Brotherhood has infiltrated the US government, society, and even possibly the presidency. Gaffney is perhaps one of the most prolific pushers of the conspiracy theory. In addition to once serving as Sen. Ted Cruz’s foreign policy adviser, Gaffney has appeared on Steve Bannon’s Breitbart radio program 34 times, the New York Times reported. In 2015, then-senator Jeff Sessions, now Trump’s attorney general, accepted the Center for Security Policy’s “Keeper of the Flame Award.”
In a response to Tuesday’s article by BuzzFeed News, El-Sayed said a statement, “I knew that in choosing to run for Governor as an unapologetic, proud Muslim and American, I was going to contend with the ugly face of white supremacy that Donald Trump and his friends have sanctioned.”
“But I know that every day I serve this state and this country by holding us to our ideals and our constitution which empower and inspire me to serve every single person in our state, regardless of my ethnicity, color, or faith. I know how much this means to so many people of color who feel locked out of political representation and government decisions,” he said.
The chair of the Michigan Democrats called on Bill Schuette, the leading Republican candidate for governor and current attorney general, to condemn the remarks.
Michigan GOP spokesperson Sarah Anderson told BuzzFeed News, "The Michigan Republican Party isn’t interested in peddling any conspiracy theories. Anything Senator Colbeck said he was speaking for himself, not on behalf of the Party. We categorically condemn any sort of hate speech, regardless of the source."
When asked if El-Sayed’s loyalty to the United States is in question, Colbeck said in his responses to BuzzFeed News that it was “beyond question” that El-Sayed “has strong connections to individuals and groups that are not loyal to the United States,” and referenced Women’s March cofounder and activist Linda Sarsour, who has vocally backed El-Sayed.
Colbeck tried to support that by saying El-Sayed’s father-in-law is a former president and current board member on the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which was “formed by the IAP,” which “was listed in the ‘Explanatory Memorandum’ as one of the ‘friends’ of the Muslim Brotherhood.”
The Council on American-Islamic Relations is a Muslim American civil rights and advocacy organization. The IAP is in reference to the Islamic Association of Palestine, a defunct organization that was named in the explanatory memorandum.
Citing the memorandum again in his response to BuzzFeed News, Colbeck wrote:
Another organization cited along with IAP in the Explanatory Memorandum was the Muslim Students Association. El-Sayed is a past vice president of the MSA. The oath of the MSA (closely aligned with that of the Muslim Brotherhood) reads as follows:
“Alah [sic] is my lord. Islam is my life…Jihad is my spirit. Pardise [sic] is my goal. I will die to establish Islam.”
As an executive in an MSA chapter, El-Sayed certainly would have recited this pledge repeatedly.
Lean, the author and former researcher at Georgetown, said that while there is a historical link between the Muslim Brotherhood and the MSA, it was because the first chapter of the Muslim Students' Association was formed in the early 1960s, a period where a wave of Muslim students came from the Middle East and South Asia.
“It's the first time you see a visible presence of Muslims on college campuses. What are they going to do? They are going to identify with who they're with, they’re going to want to form a group with people of their faith,” Lean said.
“The first MSA chapter was formed by people who had been affiliated with, at one point or another, with the Muslim Brotherhood, but this was 1963. The idea that today, in 2018, the MSA is directly connected with the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt is absurd,” Lean added.
Colbeck’s allegation is similar to the unfounded allegations that Hillary Clinton’s top aide, Huma Abedin, was a member. “Politicians use the Muslim Brotherhood as a means of fear-mongering,” Lean said.
Finally, asked if Colbeck stood by the allegations in his presentation, he wrote that the only correction would be that El-Sayed’s father-in-law, not father, as he mentioned in the presentation, had a connection to the Muslim Brotherhood.
“If any of my testimony is inaccurate, please cite evidence of inaccuracy,” Colbeck wrote to BuzzFeed News. “If you are unable to cite any substantive inaccuracies, I encourage you to share the facts cited above with your readers.”