Stanford Doctors Protested The Vaccine Distribution Plans At Their Hospital
Of the more than 1,300 residents at Stanford Medical Center, many of them working in emergency rooms and ICUs directly with COVID-19 patients, only seven were set to receive the first batch of vaccines.
Doctors at Stanford Medical Center in California on Friday protested against the university's plan for distributing the first batch of coronavirus vaccines after only seven of the hospital's 1,300 resident physicians were set to receive one of 5,000 doses.
Despite the residents working on the front lines with COVID-19 patients in the emergency room and intensive care unit, officials decided to give priority to hospital administrators, doctors working from home seeing patients via video, and others with no direct contact with COVID-19 patients.
"A dermatologist who is only seeing patients over video in a clinic should not be getting a vaccine before a nurse who is seeing COVID patients every day. It just doesn't make sense," Dr. Angela Primbas, a resident and one of the organizers of Friday's protest, told BuzzFeed News. "Almost none of the residents that were staffing the emergency room—where upwards of 50% of patients have COVID —none of the residents covering the ICUs, and none of the residents that are intubating COVID patients that can no longer breathe, got priority."
In a statement to BuzzFeed News, Stanford Medicine officials acknowledged they made a mistake in their plan and apologized to frontline staff for the mistake.
"We take complete responsibility for the errors in the execution of our vaccine distribution plan," they said. "Our intent was to develop an ethical and equitable process for our distribution of the vaccine. We apologize to our entire community, including our residents, fellows, and other frontline care providers, who have performed heroically during our pandemic response."
They said they would change their plans for distribution but did not specify how. In the meantime, some faculty, doctors and administrators who don't treat COVID patients and were set to receive the vaccine have volunteered to have frontline doctors and workers receive it instead.
Inside the hospital, doctors and staff in scrubs held signs that read "First in the room, back of the line," "Vaccinate Healthcare Heroes," and "7 out of 1349."
"We're constantly asked to volunteer our holiday time, our time off, and I understand there's a pandemic, but we also want to know that the institution that we're working for has our backs," Primbas said. "We're asked to give more, take more risks, but we weren't considered a priority."
Primbas said the problem didn't seem only restricted to residents, but to nurses, respiratory specialists, and custodial staff in the emergency room and ICU who have said they too were not given priority during the first wave of vaccinations.
"A lot of them seemed to have been left out of the first wave of COVID vaccinations in favor of people that don't have direct COVID contact," she said.
Some hospital administrators addressed the demonstrating doctors Friday, telling them priority was set by an algorithm that considered risk factors, such as age and health risks, into the priority list.
But Primbas and other doctors have said administrators were made aware of problems with the algorithm earlier this week, yet decided to move forward with the plan anyway.
Primbas said staff were notified who would be prioritized yesterday afternoon, prompting residents to quickly organize the protest.
People started to become aware of problems with the distribution when doctors and other staff — like doctors working from home or radiologists who were not interacting with patients — started to come forward themselves, saying they had been set to receive a vaccine.
Dr. Mary Hawn, chair of the department of surgery, reportedly emailed her department saying she was "disturbed and puzzled" that many of the people slated to be given the vaccine this week were not on the frontline, ProPublica reported. She suggested that those not on the frontline would instead show up to their appointment with a resident to get the dose instead.
Department heads and other top officials at the hospital have been supportive during what has been a difficult time, Primbas said, but hospital administrators appeared to have significantly missed the mark in their plan for the vaccine, forcing staff to speak out Friday.
"I don't want to point fingers or blame, but it did give us pause and caused us to advocate for having representatives from different clinical care units represented at whatever decision-making table exists," she said. "I think the institution does value us, but I think they really did not think this one through."
Dr. Ronald Witteles, program director of the Internal Residency Training Program at Stanford called the vaccine rollout plan "an absolute mess" and, in a series of tweets, said doctors were rightly upset over the plan.
But he noted he didn't think there were any bad intentions in the plan or the algorithm that had been developed for it.
"This was not malice or a specific intent to exclude housestaff," he tweeted. "This algorithm was well-intentioned but clearly hopelessly flawed. The lack of sanity check being done on its output before it was put into action was a shocking and inexcusable error."
Residents have been told they were all expected to receive a vaccine before the end of January when more doses are available. In the meantime, all faculty—except those considered at highest risk—have been asked to give up their spots in line.
"I was proud to be one of those to take the pledge & cancelled my #vaccine spot today, as did so many of my colleagues throughout the @StanfordDeptMed, include every member of leadership," Witteles wrote. "Our residents and fellows have started getting vaccinated instead, as it should be."
The turmoil also illustrates the difficult decisions multiple institutions will face in prioritizing who gets access to the vaccine in the coming months.
With limited access to doses, hospitals and other institutions are left making decisions on whether to prioritize those at higher risk of health complications if infected with COVID-19, or those with the most constant, direct exposure to the virus.
"It's not an enviable job to try to figure out how to distribute that," Primbas said. "But I do think in this case it is sort of clear that someone who is intubating a COVID patient should be prioritized over someone who is not even working with patients."