Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

National Review Disinvited From GOP Debate After Publishing Anti-Trump Issue

The publisher of the conservative magazine says he wasn't surprised the Republican National Committee disinvited it from an upcoming GOP debate: "After all, it's their party and they can deprive [it] if they want to."

Posted on January 22, 2016, at 12:51 a.m. ET

Aaron P. Bernstein / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The publisher of the conservative National Review suggested on Thursday that the Republican National Committee is "depriving" its party by disinviting the magazine from hosting a debate because of an anti-Donald Trump symposium it published.

National Review publisher Jack Fowler told BuzzFeed News in an email Thursday night that he was not surprised that the RNC had rescinded its invitation to the magazine to co-host a GOP debate next month. "That said I would argue that the RNC should have waited for someone to complain, if someone was going to," Fowler said. "The presumption is that our moderator / participant would not have asked an intelligent / fair question."

"But maybe the RNC based the decision on something along the lines of — you guys just crossed a line (for a debate participant). I'd like to see their statement, if / when it comes out," Fowler said. "After all, it's their party and they can deprive [it] if they want to."

On Thursday, National Review published an "Against Trump" issue that features essays arguing against nominating Trump by a range of conservative thinkers, including radio host and blogger Erick Erickson, radio host Glenn Beck, writer John Podhoretz, and evangelical leader Russell Moore. The magazine also published its own editorial calling Trump a "menace to American conservatism."

Fowler published a post on Thursday after the manifesto came out announcing that the RNC had uninvited National Review from the debate it was supposed to co-host on February 25.

Reached on Thursday night, RNC spokesman Sean Spicer confirmed the rescinded invitation and said "A debate moderator can't have a predisposition."

Fowler told BuzzFeed News that the magazine had not yet had pushback from the Trump campaign itself, apart from several tweets by Trump on Thursday night. "The late, great, William F. Buckley would be ashamed of what had happened to his prize, the dying National Review!" Trump tweeted.

While there have been signs that parts of the Republican establishment may be reconciling to Trump, the "Against Trump" issue is a significant salvo against Trump from within the conservative intelligentsia.

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.