Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Obama Sees Sharpest Drop In Donors From Western States

Oregon, Colorado, Nevada, and Idaho are home to the highest percentage of 2008 Obama donors who have yet to contribute $200 or more this year. Analysts cite the issues, from climate change to the war in Iraq, and the economy.

Posted on June 12, 2012, at 11:19 a.m. ET

Percentage decrease in donors who gave $200 to Barack Obama in 2008 but have not yet in 2012, by state. The darker the state, the higher the percentage of drop-off donors. (BuzzFeed/Ky Harlin)

As Mitt Romney's campaign fundraising gathers steam, boosted by huge contributions to allied groups, President Barack Obama is unexpectedly struggling to keep pace — and he may be having the hardest time in the mountainous west, where moderate Democrats have made deep inroads in recent years.

As BuzzFeed reported last week, 88% of donors who gave $200 or more to Obama in 2008 have yet to give that amount to his campaign this cycle.

A deeper analysis of campaign finance data shows that the west has seen an especially high level of drop off in Obama donors. Oregon topped the list with a 91% decrease in donors giving at least $200—the amount required for contributions to be individually reported—and Colorado, Nevada, and Idaho were close behind.

Vermont, Maine, and Michigan saw donors remaining most loyal to Obama, and showed the lowest percentage decrease.

Three of the high drop off states — Oregon, Nevada, and Colorado — went for Obama in the 2008 election, Oregon is expected to do so again this November. Idaho is solidly red, while Colorado and Nevada, with their respective 9 and 6 electoral votes, remain crucial battlegrounds.

Democratic consultants and political scientists offered a range of theories for the drop-off in donors in a region with libertarian leanings and moderate instincts, relatively few African-Americans, and pockets of progressive politics.

Richard Skinner, an assistant professor of political science at the New College of Florida, noted that the Pacific Northwest has traditionally been a stronghold of the progressive movement, many of whose adherents hoped for a far more combative, liberal Obama embrace of policies like single-payer health care.

“Maybe more so than in other parts of the country, you have strongly liberal views and a dislike of politics as usual,” Skinner said. “Donors in those states would be probably even more inclined to be sort of idealistic donors — people who are motivated by purist views on issues, people who are uncomfortable with compromise.”

In the case of Oregon, one of the issues that inspired voters to put money behind Obama in 2008 was getting American troops away from combat. That urgency has now faded. “Oregon was the most virulently anti-war states during the Iraq war,” said Jake Weigler, director of Oregon Communications at Strategies 360, a strategic communications firm. “That was a powerful motivator during the 2008 election. It may not be as powerful a one now.”

Percentage decrease in Oregon and Colorado Obama donors by county. The darker the county, the higher the percentage of drop off donors. (BuzzFeed/Ky Harlin)

In Colorado, which has long been focused on environmental and energy policy, the enthusiasm gap amongst donors may be related to Obama’s lack of progress on his environmental agenda, said John Straayer, a professor of political science at Colorado State University.

The state also saw a surge in independents and young, college-educated voters were drawn into politics by Obama's 2008 campaign.

“They’re probably more likely to be disappointed in that they don’t have as much experience in the political process,” said Robert Duffy, a professor of political science at Colorado State University, in reference to young or independent voters.

Tough economic circumstances may also underlie some Western donors’ reluctance to contribute to Obama’s re-election campaign. Nevada, in particular, was hit hard by the housing market's collapse in 2008, and now suffers from a staggering 11.7% unemployment rate in April. But the rough economic conditions were cited by donors around the country in interviews with BuzzFeed as a reason they hadn't given to Obama again this cycle.

“I don’t think the money has gone someplace else,” said Paul Berendt, Senior Vice President of Strategies 360 and former chairman of the Washington State Democratic Party.“It’s really that people don’t have as much money to spend on politics.”

(With data analysis by Ky Harlin.)

Percentage decrease in Nevada and Idaho Obama donors by county. The darker the county, the higher the percentage of drop off donors. (BuzzFeed/Ky Harlin)

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.