Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

The Judge In The Harvey Weinstein Trial Told Potential Jurors The “Case Is Not A Referendum On #MeToo”

Five people — three men and two women — have been selected to sit on the jury.

Posted on January 16, 2020, at 3:14 p.m. ET

Scott Heins / Getty Images

Harvey Weinstein outside court on Thursday.

NEW YORK — As the process of picking potential jurors in the Harvey Weinstein trial continued Thursday, Judge James Burke told approximately 140 people in the courtroom that the trial would not be a “referendum on #MeToo.”

“This trial is not a referendum on #MeToo or sexual harassment,” he told the potential jurors at the New York State Supreme Court building. “It is not a referendum on women’s rights — there’s no controversy here that [women’s rights] are good.”

During the second week of jury selection, five people — three men and two women — were picked as jurors. Earlier in the day, model Gigi Hadid, who initially told the court she could remain impartial despite having previously met Weinstein, was dismissed from jury duty.

Burke told the prospective jurors in the courtroom Thursday that they have a right to their own beliefs as long as they don’t interfere with determining the verdict of the case.

“The issue is not if you feel strongly about those subjects, but only if those beliefs would prevent you from deciding the facts on the case,” he said.

Burke underscored the importance of deciding the outcome of the trial solely by the evidence presented in court.

“Deciding this case despite the evidence would mean that you find the defendant guilty even though it was not proven that he was, because of sympathy or beliefs about some other matter such as sexual harassment, women’s rights, or the #MeToo movement,” Burke said. “You must not do that.”

Jury selection will continue through next week. Opening statements are expected Jan. 22.

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.