Earlier this month, Minneapolis Mayor Betsy Hodges became rankled in a weird controversy over this photo of her and an election volunteer:
This week, Hodges called out Delmonico and the police union on her blog for inciting #pointergate.
As one of the two people pointing in the photo, I've tried to understand what the head of the police union thinks I should do, or not do. There seem to be four options.
First, maybe the head of the police union would like me to stop pointing altogether for the safety of the community. If that were truly his concern, that my pointing constitutes gang activity, then his outrage would have been sparked long, long ago. Because as the internet has documented in great detail, I point. I point a lot. Lots of people point. The President. Bill Clinton. Stephen Colbert. Babies. It is the earliest form of human communication.* I'm not going to stop pointing.
That option doesn't make sense.
In her post, Hodges lays out several other ridiculous options she feels might appease the police union, such as asking people on the street if they're felons, have gang ties, or just not talking to black people. She meant to prove her point that the whole #pointergate thing is absurd.
Finally, Hodges makes a suggestion that alludes to the simmering tension between the mayor and the cops:
This is yet one more option that doesn't make sense.
Which leaves one final option. It could be that the head of the police union wants me to stop working to raise the standards of police culture and accountability. It could be that he objects to the community policing and relationship-building measures that I am acting on, and attempted to use this non-story to discredit this work.
I share the public's speculation that this is the real option.