Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

If You Tweeted Out Kanye's iPhone Password, You Might Have Broken The Law

The US’s main hacking law is written so broadly that tweeting somebody’s password could theoretically bring charges.

Posted on October 12, 2018, at 3:13 p.m. ET

Pool / Getty Images

When hundreds of thousands of people gleefully shared Kanye West’s absurdly easy-to-guess iPhone password after he entered it in front of cameras while visiting the White House — 000000, literally the easiest six-digit password to guess — they probably weren’t worried about cops knocking on their door.

But while the odds are extremely low that the government would ever prosecute any of them, the nature of the US’s primary hacking law, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, means that publicly sharing someone’s password without their permission could be considered a federal crime.

One of the many ways of violating the CFAA — which carries a maximum prison sentence of 10 years in prison per charge — is if someone “knowingly and with intent to defraud traffics in any password or similar information through which a computer may be accessed without authorization.”

“As a matter of intuitive, fundamental concepts of justice, we don’t think of those things that could be innocently shared but potentially lead to 10 years in prison,” Fred Jennings, a Brooklyn attorney who specializes in CFAA cases, told BuzzFeed News. “They probably would not prosecute something this absurd, but they have the ability to. Which means when something as factually absurd crosses some prosecutor’s desk, you’re at their mercy.”

Passed into law in 1986 after President Ronald Reagan watched the 1983 movie WarGames and demanded new legislation to keep hackers from triggering World War III, and only tangentially updated since then, the CFAA has long been criticized as being written so broadly that it gives the government the authority to prosecute computer activity as it sees fit.

One of the most infamous examples is Reddit cofounder Aaron Swartz, who in 2011 was charged with 11 CFAA violations after downloading articles from JSTOR, an academic library, to make them public. Fearing a decades-long sentence, Swartz hanged himself.

Pool / Getty Images

Kanye's iPhone during a meeting in the Oval Office.

The best protection for the hundreds of thousands of people who tweeted and retweeted Kanye’s password is the phrase “intent to defraud,” given that most people on Twitter were clearly trying to mock West, and weren’t openly advising people close to the rapper to grab his phone and log in.

But still, Jennings said, intent to defraud is extremely easy for a prosecutor to charge, even if it’s hard to convict.

“You don’t need a clear, written statement saying ‘Yes, my intent is to extract money from this individual whose password I’m selling.’ You can infer it from facts and circumstances. As a practical matter, those are almost always taken in a pick-and-choose sense, in the worst possible context,” Jennings said.

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.