Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

There Was Drama At The UN That Would've Fit Right In At A Model UN

Nice try, Egypt, but no gavel for you.

Posted on March 11, 2016, at 11:06 p.m. ET

The United Nations Security Council passed a new resolution on Friday, one that for the first time focused on UN peacekeepers who commit sexual assault and other crimes.

Don Emmert / AFP / Getty Images

The vote was 14 in favor with one abstention, which is a pretty overwhelming show of support on the 15-member Council.

The one abstention was cast by Egypt, which is better than a "no" vote, one would think.

Carlo Allegri / Reuters

But before the vote was cast, the drama at the UN might have fit in better at a Model United Nations conference.

NBC Universal

So here's the deal: the resolution that passed basically says that if a peacekeeper is accused of abuses and its country hasn't taken action, the UN Secretary-General can replace the entire contingent of peacekeepers with soldiers from another country.

Albert Gonzalez Farran / AFP / Getty Images
2. Requests the Secretary-General, when a particular troop-contributing country whose personnel are subject of allegations of sexual exploitation and abuse has not taken appropriate steps to investigate the allegations, has not held the perpetrators accountable, and has not informed the Secretary-General of its actions, to replace all military units and/or formed police units of the troop- or police-contributing country in the United Nations peacekeeping operation where the allegations arose with uniformed personnel from a different troop- or police-contributing country, as applicable and further requests the Secretary-General to ensure that the replacement troop- or police-contributing country has upheld standards of conduct and discipline and appropriately addressed allegations against or confirmed acts, if any, of sexual exploitation and abuse by its personnel;

That may look like an innocuous clause, but it would actually have changed the entire point of the resolution — which, as any former Model UN delegate can tell you, is a total taboo.

20th Century Fox

If you're not sure what the difference is, the Egyptian amendment would have deleted the word "or" and left in the word "and." So rather than the Secretary-General taking action if any one of three situations occurred, if Egyptian's change had passed, all three conditions would have to be met.

Egypt insisted that the change was harmless, despite the fact that the United States and others had rejected it during the drafting. So when it hit the floor on Friday, Ambassador to the UN Samantha Power was having none of it.

Jack Guez / AFP / Getty Images

Like, at all.

View this video on YouTube

The amendment totally failed to meet the nine vote minimum. But it would've gone down anyway as the United States, United Kingdom, and France all voted no, and so would have exercised their veto power to kill it if need be.

The resolution went on to pass. But the U.S. wasn't done dragging Egypt and its allies.

Better luck next conference, Egypt.

NBC Universal

You can read the full text of the resolution that passed here:

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.