Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Ellen Pao To Appeal Gender Discrimination Lawsuit Verdict

Pao is also seeking to have the nearly $1 million she owes Kleiner Perkins in legal fees stricken.

Last updated on June 1, 2015, at 7:32 p.m. ET

Posted on May 8, 2015, at 1:47 p.m. ET

Ellen Pao will appeal the result of a high-profile gender discrimination lawsuit she lost against a Silicon Valley venture capital firm.

Earlier this year, Pao lost all four claims in her lawsuit against Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers, where she was a junior investing partner. She had claimed gender discrimination after she was passed over for senior partner, but a jury sided with the firm, finding that it did not engage in retaliation or discrimination.

Pao — who is now chief executive of Reddit — filed a claim in May arguing that the $972,814.50 she owes in legal fees to the firm is "grossly excessive and unreasonable."

Her decision to appeal, which was reported Monday by Reuters and other media outlets, appears to take a previous offer by Kleiner Perkins Caufield and Byers to wave the legal fees "should Ellen Pao choose to bring this legal matter to a close."

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

The case captivated Silicon Valley and become a flashpoint in the ongoing discussion about the treatment and role of women in the tech industry. The verdict was seen as a major victory for Kleiner Perkins, which maintained throughout the trial that it has a good record on women, and that Pao was fired for subpar performance, not her gender.

Since she lost the case, Pao was left on the hook for Kleiner Perkins' legal fees. But in her subsequent claim, she cites new California Supreme Court case law saying that in order to recover costs, the firm must prove that Pao's case was "frivolous or malicious — a standard which it cannot meet." The filing makes particular note of the $864,680.25 in expert witness fees Kleiner Perkins is seeking, arguing that they are "unreasonable and unnecessary, particularly when compared to the expert fees" for Pao's witnesses.

"In defending this lawsuit, Kleiner Perkins quite literally spared no expense, hiring duplicative expert witnesses and charging exorbitant rates for travel and accommodations" the filing reads.

As an example, the filing cites the case of expert witness Paul Gompers, who racked up $3,017.20 in costs flying from Boston to San Francisco for a single day of testimony. As Pao's lawyer, Alan Exelrod, notes in a declaration in support of Pao's motion, "non-stop roundtrip economy airfare from Boston to San Francisco is generally less than $750.00."

Want to see more stories like this? Become a BuzzFeed News member.

ADVERTISEMENT