Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Federal Judge Strikes Down South Carolina's Same-Sex Marriage Ban

The ruling is on hold until noon on Nov. 20.

Posted on November 12, 2014, at 10:55 a.m. ET


A federal judge struck down South Carolina's ban on same-sex couples' marriages Wednesday, although he put his ruling on hold until noon on Nov. 20.

U.S. District Court Judge Richard Mark Gergel's decision followed the prior decision of the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in striking down Virginia's similar ban. The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of that case, Bostic v. Schaefer, meaning that the 4th Circuit ruling is binding law on all states within the 4th Circuit — which includes South Carolina.

"[T]he Court finds that Bostic provides clear and controlling legal authority in this Circuit and that Plaintiffs are entitled to judgment as a matter of law," Gergel wrote.

Gergel's ruling put South Carolina's governor and attorney general, who had been defendants in the lawsuit brought by a lesbian couple, on the losing side of the debate — although the judge ruled that Gov. Nikki Haley was not a proper party to the lawsuit because she had not taken enforcement actions relating to stopping same-sex couples' marriages. Attorney General Alan Wilson, however, was found to be a proper defendant, as was the probate judge who denied the couple their marriage license.

In addition to arguing that they should not have been defendants in the lawsuit, they argued that a 1972 Supreme Court decision — recently relied upon by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals in upholding marriage bans there — could trump other lower court rulings on marriage and related Supreme Court rulings. Gergel, however, ruled that the 4th Circuit, in the Bostic case, "has exhaustively addressed the issues raised by the Defendants and firmly and unambiguously recognized the fundamental right of same sex couples to marry and the power of the federal courts to address and vindicate that right."

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.