Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Supreme Court Sides With Demoted Worker In First Amendment Challenge

A 6-2 win for public employees.

Posted on April 26, 2016, at 10:59 a.m. ET

Win Mcnamee / Getty Images

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court expanded protections for government workers on Tuesday, deciding that the First Amendment bars an employer from demoting an employee that the employer believes is engaged in protected political activity — even if the employee actually isn't doing so.

Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the 6-2 majority opinion for the court, finding in favor of Jeffrey Heffernan, a former police detective who was demoted after he was seen picking up a campaign sign of the mayor's political opponent.

While he was demoted because the leadership of the police department believed this meant Heffernan was "involved" in the opponent's campaign, he was not. Instead, he was merely picking up a yard sign for his sick mother.

While the First Amendment has been understood to protect against such demotions when a worker actually is engaged in protected political activity, as Breyer wrote, the question in Heffernan's case was whether that protection extended to situations in which the employer "incorrectly believed" the employee was engaged in such activity.

"We conclude that ... the government's reason for demoting Heffernan is what counts here," Breyer wrote. "When an employer demotes an employee out of a desire to prevent the employee from engaging in political activity that the First Amendment protects, the employee is entitled to challenge that unlawful action under the First Amendment and 42 U. S. C. §1983—even if, as here, the employer makes a factual mistake about the employee’s behavior."

Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Samuel Alito, dissented.

BuzzFeed News’ FinCEN Files investigation exposed massive financial corruption on a historic global scale. Want to support our journalism? Become a BuzzFeed News member.

ADVERTISEMENT