Skip To Content
BuzzFeed News Home Reporting To You

Utilizamos cookies, próprios e de terceiros, que o reconhecem e identificam como um usuário único, para garantir a melhor experiência de navegação, personalizar conteúdo e anúncios, e melhorar o desempenho do nosso site e serviços. Esses Cookies nos permitem coletar alguns dados pessoais sobre você, como sua ID exclusiva atribuída ao seu dispositivo, endereço de IP, tipo de dispositivo e navegador, conteúdos visualizados ou outras ações realizadas usando nossos serviços, país e idioma selecionados, entre outros. Para saber mais sobre nossa política de cookies, acesse link.

Caso não concorde com o uso cookies dessa forma, você deverá ajustar as configurações de seu navegador ou deixar de acessar o nosso site e serviços. Ao continuar com a navegação em nosso site, você aceita o uso de cookies.

Additional Info Ordered To Be Turned Over In Clinton Email Lawsuit — But Not Before Mid-Spring

A federal judge on Tuesday granted a request for depositions and other evidence in Judicial Watch's lawsuit against the State Department. The timeline put forth by the judge, however, means the information won't be public until after mid-April.

Posted on February 23, 2016, at 5:50 p.m. ET

Justin Sullivan / Getty Images

Hillary Clinton and aide Huma Abedin at a Dunkin Donuts on February 7, 2016 in Manchester, New Hampshire.

WASHINGTON — A federal judge has said he will force testimony and additional evidence regarding Hillary Clinton's use of a personal email during her time as secretary of state — but he's also pushed off the time when that evidence will begin to be turned over until sometime after mid-April.

U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan on Tuesday granted Judicial Watch's request for discovery that the group had requested in their ongoing Freedom of Information Act litigation against the State Department.

The decision could lead to depositions of senior advisers to Clinton, both those from during her time in the State Department and in the time since. It also could lead to additional emails being turned over. In their discovery request, which was granted today, Judicial Watch noted that finding out "whether additional, responsive emails exist and to identify where they may be located ... may require subpoenaing of archived copies ... of Mrs. Clinton’s and Ms. [Huma] Abedin’s emails."

While the information being sought in Judicial Watch's attempt to prove "whether the State Department and Mrs. Clinton deliberately thwarted FOIA" is quite extensive, Sullivan on Tuesday asked for "a detailed, narrowly tailored, discovery plan."

The timeline that Sullivan laid out for moving forward means that the group won't even be able to proceed with seeking the additional information until mid-April, at the earliest, which further means that the information being sought would become public even later than that.

Judicial Watch is due to put forth its discovery plan by March 15. The State Department then has until April 5 to respond, with a reply from Judicial Watch by April 12.

Among the people Judicial Watch's lawyers said they would be seeking to depose are several State Department employees, including under secretary for management Patrick F. Kennedy, director of IPS John F. Hackett, and executive secretary Joseph E. Macmanus; and several former employees or post-State staffers — including Abedin; Cheryl Mills; and Bryan Pagliano, a longtime IT staffer for Clinton. For those who are no longer at the State Department, Judicial Watch lawyers made it clear they "may have to serve third party deposition and/or document subpoenas on such persons after they have been identified."

Here are the underlying questions that Judicial Watch is seeking to answer about the creation of the system:

Here are the underlying questions that Judicial Watch is seeking to answer about the use of the system:

Here are the underlying questions that Judicial Watch is seeking to answer about Clinton's departure from the State Department and the handling of the system after she left the State Department:

Here is the entry and order from the court in Judicial Watch v. State Department on Tuesday:

A BuzzFeed News investigation, in partnership with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, based on thousands of documents the government didn't want you to see.